VENKATARAMIAH,E.S. (CJ)
GAJANAN JAIKISHAN JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
PRABHAKAR MOHANLAL KALWAR – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 4
PETITIONER:
GAJANAN JAIKISHAN JOSHI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
PRABHAKAR MOHANLAL KALWAR
DATE OF JUDGMENT13/12/1989
BENCH:
VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (CJ)
BENCH:
VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (CJ)
KANIA, M.H.
CITATION:
1989 SCR Supl. (2) 474 1990 SCC (1) 166
JT 1989 (4) 524 1989 SCALE (2)1323
ACT:
Civil Procedure Code, 1908: Order VI Rule
17--Plaint-Amendment of--When to be permitted.
Specific Relief Act, 1963: Section 16(c)--Suit for
specific performance-Amendment of plaint----Permissibility
of.
HEADNOTE:
For selling an immovable property, respondent entered
into an agreement with the appellant. Appellant paid part of
the consideration and he was put in possession of the
property. Since the respondent failed to execute the regis-
tered sale-deed, the appellant filed a suit. There was no
specific averment in the suit that the appellant was and had
always been ready and willing to perform his part of the
agreement.
Respondent contended inter-alia that the suit was not
maintainable for non-compliance with the provisions of
Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.