http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 7

PETITIONER:

FIRM GANPAT RAM RAJKUMAR

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

KALU RAM & ORS.

DATE OF JUDGMENT22/09/1989

BENCH:

MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J)

BENCH:

MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J)

RAY, B.C. (J)

CITATION:

1989 AIR 2285 1989 SCR Supl. (1) 223

1989 SCC Supl. (2) 418 JT 1989 Supl. 258

1989 SCALE (2)692

CITATOR INFO :

F 1992 SC1537 (6)

ACT:

Contempt of Court Act 1971--Section 2(b), Order of this

Court--Not complied with by the petitioner--Whether provi-

sions of sections 2(b) & 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act

1971--Attracted.

HEADNOTE:

The Respondent filed proceedings for eviction against

the Petitioner firm in respect of a property situated at

Narnaul under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Evic-

tion) Act, 1973 and obtained a decree of eviction. Petition-

er’s appeal against that decree failed in the High Court and

the Special Leave Petition filed by it in this Court was

also dismissed on 24.8.87. While dismissing the Special

Leave Petition this Court inter alia directed that the order

of eviction shall not be executed for a period of six months

on the Petitioner’s fi