IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.472 OF 2007

JAYWANT BHAGUJI GADEKAR

Appellant(s)

Versus

BALALESHWAR SHIKSHAN MANDAL & ORS.

Respondent(s)

O R D E R

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and

order dated 10th June, 2003 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High

Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.6046 of 2002 whereby the

High Court has set aside the order of the Tribunal and held that once the

petitioner has sent the letter of resignation and the same has not been withdrawn,

therefore, it becomes final and the view taken by the Tribunal was not correct.

Aggrieved against this order the petitioner filed a Letters Patent Appeal but it was

rejected on the ground that it is not maintainable. Hence the petitioner has

approached this Court by way of a special leave petition challenging the order of

the

...2/-

-2-

learned Single Judge dated 10^th June, 2003. Leave was granted by this Court.

The brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal are

that the appellant was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the Balaleshwar

Shikshan Mandal against a clear and permanent vacancy on probation. Certain

complaints were received against the appellant from the students regarding his

misbehaviour. In the wake of these complaints, the appellant tendered conditional

resignation on 16^th August, 1998. The letter of resignation was sent to the

Chairman of the Institution. It was alleged that since the allegations have been

levelled against him and he want to be absolved of the allegations, he tender his

resignation from the post and after an inquiry is held and he is exonerated, he may

be reinstated. The letter of resignation dated 16^th August, 1998 reads as under :-

“Due to the various allegations levelled against the institution, the

charges are orally levied upon me. In that regard I am held responsible for

adverse effect on the image of Institution and School. Till the time of conclusion

of appropriate inquiry into the said charges, I

...3/-

-3-

am tendering resignation from my post. If I am found innocent then I shall be

given an opportunity to discharge my duties.”

That was responded by the Institution by the communication dated

9^th December, 1998 and accepted the resignation and relieved the appellant.

Thereafter, on 11^th December, 1998 the management revoked the letter dated 9^th

December, 1998 accepting the resignation of the appellant. The resultant position

is that normally he shall be treated to have restored to service as the management

has declined to accept the conditinal resignation. The appellant did not approach

the management and filed a petition before the School Tribunal, Pune Region and

the Tribunal by its order dated 25^th June, 2002 allowed the appeal of the appellant

and ordered that the impugned action of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 of not allowing

the appellant to join duties by the end of the August, 1998 is hereby set aside.

The Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were directed to reinstate the appellant as an

Assistant Teacher with effect from 1^st September, 1998 with full backwages.

This order was challenged by the School Management by filing a writ

petition before the High Court

...4/-

-4-

and the learned Single Judge of the High Court after reviewing the matter came to

the conclusion that since the appellant has already resigned, therefore, there is no

right to continue in service. In that context, the learned Single Judge ordered that

no specific letter has been adverted to by the Tribunal in its judgment nor that

letter has been made available before this Court withdrawing the communication

dated 9.12.1998 and accepting the letter of resignation of the appellant. We regret

that the view taken by the learned Single Judge of the High Court is not correct.

The appellant sent a letter of resignation with a condition that