Advocates:
RAJ BAHADUR YADAV

1

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5263-5264/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-03-2021

in WP No. 6545/2020 07-09-2021 in RVWPET No. 118/2021 passed by the

High Court Of Orissa At Cuttack)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RAMA CHANDRA LENKA Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44042/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING

C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.44044/2022-PERMISSION TO

FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

Date : 18-04-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

For Petitioner(s)

Ms. Madhavi Divan, ASG

Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv.

Ms. Vishakha, Adv.

Ms. Vaishali Verma, Adv.

Ms. Aishan Narain, Adv.

Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Amresh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The learned Additional Solicitor General contends that the

respondent was granted pay upgradation at par with his junior

Mr.Amiya Kumar Behera vide order dated 28.07.2014, but again the

respondent has sought upgradation of his pay at par with another

junior - Mr. Raghunath Das, which was rejected on 11.02.2015.

It is contended that the respondent can claim one stepping up

of pay keeping his junior but cannot revise his claim for stepping

Digitally signed by

Jayant Kumar Arora

Date: 2022.04.19

15:47:01 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

up of pay in respect of another junior.

Issue notice.

In the meantime, there shall be stay of operation and

implementation of the impugned Judgment.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR)

COURT MASTER COURT MASTER