SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VENKATARAMIAH,E.S. (J)
TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
SLP(C) No.-016698-016698 / 1992
16-01-1987
C. K. SUCHARITAANIL KATIYAR
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 5
PETITIONER:
TELECOMMUNICATION RESEARCH CENTRE SCIENTIFICOFFICERS (CLASS
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
DATE OF JUDGMENT16/01/1987
BENCH:
VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J)
BENCH:
VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J)
SINGH, K.N. (J)
CITATION:
1987 AIR 490 1987 SCR (1)1007
1987 SCC (1) 582 JT 1987 (1) 152
1987 SCALE (1)62
ACT:
Constitution of India, 1950: Articles 14 and 16: Civil
Services-Pay parity--Scientific and Technical Officers,
class I, Telecommunication Research Centre--Direct recruits
through Union Public Service Commission--Denied special pay
admissible to--Departmental Transferred Officers Class
I--Held discriminatory and ultra vires.
HEADNOTE:
The recruitment to Class I posts in the Telecommunica-
tion Research Centre of the Posts and Telegraphs Department
is made partly by direct recruitment through the Union
Public Service Commission and partly through transfer of
Group A and Group B Field Officers. The officers brought
into the Centre on transfer were being paid special pay in
addition to their pay. The direct recruits were denied this
privilege.
The petitioners 2 to 22, members of the first petition-
er-Association, who belong to the direct recruits category
and are working in the Centre on the same posts, and possess
same qualifications, discharge same functions and duties as
the transferred officers, and are in the same pay scales,
assailed the denial of special pay to them as discriminatory
and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Their claim was contested by the Department and the discrim-
ination was sought to be justified on the ground that the
direct recruits were. specifically recruited to the Centre
for a limited purpose and their capability, as against
transferred officers, selected by the Union Public Service
Commission after rigorous competitive examination, of tak-
ing. over a complete group and directing them to fruitful
research was doubtful.
Allowing the writ petitions, the Court,
HELD: 1. Denial of special pay to Class I direct re-
cruits in the Telecommunication Research Centre amounts to
violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. They
are entitled to the special pay at the same rates at which
it is paid to the transferred officers working in that
Centre with effect from the date from which the latter have
been drawing it. [1013B-C]
1008
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 2 of 5
2.1 It is not the case of the Government that the peti-
tioners are not competent and are not able to discharge
their duties. All the relevant things such as qualifica-
tions, functions, duties and responsibilities are the same
as between the direct recruits and the transferred offi-
cials. Their scale of pay is also the same. [1011G-H]
2.2 The special pay is not being paid to the transferred
officials for compensating their displacement or for their
qualifications. It is not deputation allowance. It is paid
for the arduous and special nature of the functions to be
discharged in the Telecommunication Research Centre. The
rigorous test is applied while transferring them to the
Centre to prevent persons of inferior caliber amongst them
getting into it. It does not mean that persons who are
directly recruited and working in the Centre are inferior to
those who enter the Centre by transfer. Nor it could be said
that the transferred officials had to perform in the Centre
duties which were not in their general line. There was,
thus, no justification to deny the special pay at the same
rates to the direct recruits working in that Centre. [1011H;
1012A-B; 1013A]
Randhir Singh v. Union of India and Others, [1982] 3
SCR, 298 and M.P. Singh & Others v. Union of India, Writ
Petition Nos. 13097--13176 of 1984, decided on January 16,
1987, applied.