[LALIT MOHAN SHARMA,S. MOHAN AND N. VENKATACHALA,JJ.]
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Appellant
Versus
KAMLESH JAIN – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 4
PETITIONER:
STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
KAMLESH JAIN
DATE OF JUDGMENT05/11/1992
BENCH:
[LALIT MOHAN SHARMA, S. MOHAN AND N. VENKATACHALA, JJ.]
ACT:
Constitution of India, 1950:
Articles 32 and 226-Public Interest Litigation-Writ
Petition filed seeking relief for an ailing doctor, staying
with brother Maintainability of-High Court granting relief-
Validity of-State not expected to choose individuals for
special treatment-Judicial process not to be allowed to be
used for the satisfaction of individual whims-Guidelines for
entertainment of such claims laid down.
HEADNOTE:
A large number of doctors employed in the State Health
Services of the appellant-State were leaving India for
higher studies, after obtaining leave for a couple of years,
and thereafter, they were neither returning to India, nor
were sending any further applications for extension of
leave. This was causing considerable hardship to the public.
As this trend persisted, the state authorities wanted to
take appropriate corrective steps. Since the absentee
doctors had not informed the department of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.