SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RANGAIAH (D) BY LRS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA . – Respondent


Advocates:
RAJEEV SINGHVAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL

NO.8426 OF 2009

RANGAIAH (D) BY LRS.

APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties

and upon perusal of the record, we find that the

circumstances of the instant case clearly show that the

impugned action for resuming possession of the lands was

taken under sections 4 and 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of

Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (for short, the 'Act') after about

22 years of its coming into force. This has been held to be

impermissible by this Court in Civil Appeal No.2166/2009

titled as “Vivek M. Hinduja & Ors. vs. M. Ashwatha & Ors.”,

and other decisions considered therein.

Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, impugned judgment

passed by the High Court as also the authorities are set

aside, and the proceedings initiated by the Assistant

Commissioner, Shimoga Sub-Division, Shimoga, against the

appellants are quashed.

....................J

[S. A. BOBDE]

....................J

[L. NAGESWARA RAO]

NEW DELHI;

DECEMBER 06,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top