SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VENKATASWAMI K. (J)
KARAM DEVI – Appellant
Versus
RAM PARKASH – Respondent


Advocates:
SHEELA GOELC. L. SAHU

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 3

PETITIONER:

JINDA RAM (DEAD) BY LRS.

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

RAM PRAKASH & ANR.

DATE OF JUDGMENT10/11/1995

BENCH:

VENKATASWAMI K. (J)

BENCH:

VENKATASWAMI K. (J)

VERMA, JAGDISH SARAN (J)

CITATION:

1995 SCC Supl. (4) 208 1995 SCALE (6)337

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

VENKATASWAMI, J.

Leave granted.

Heard counsel on both sides.

This appeal by special leave is directed against the

judgment and order dated 18.3.1992 of the High Court of

Punjab & Haryana in RSA No. 2342 of 1981. The question that

arises for consideration in this appeal is whether a

partition effected during the pendency of the appeal affects

the right of a person who was admittedly a co-sharer at the

time of sale of pre-emption.

Brief facts are the following:

The appellants are the legal representatives of one

Jinda Ram who was the plaintiff and filed a suit for pre-

emotion for agricultural land measuring 20 kanals 4 marlas

as described in the Plaint Schedule. This right of pre-

emption was claimed under Section 15(b) fourthly and fifthly

of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 as a co-sharer a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top