VENKATASWAMI K. (J)
KARAM DEVI – Appellant
Versus
RAM PARKASH – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 3
PETITIONER:
JINDA RAM (DEAD) BY LRS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
RAM PRAKASH & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT10/11/1995
BENCH:
VENKATASWAMI K. (J)
BENCH:
VENKATASWAMI K. (J)
VERMA, JAGDISH SARAN (J)
CITATION:
1995 SCC Supl. (4) 208 1995 SCALE (6)337
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
VENKATASWAMI, J.
Leave granted.
Heard counsel on both sides.
This appeal by special leave is directed against the
judgment and order dated 18.3.1992 of the High Court of
Punjab & Haryana in RSA No. 2342 of 1981. The question that
arises for consideration in this appeal is whether a
partition effected during the pendency of the appeal affects
the right of a person who was admittedly a co-sharer at the
time of sale of pre-emption.
Brief facts are the following:
The appellants are the legal representatives of one
Jinda Ram who was the plaintiff and filed a suit for pre-
emotion for agricultural land measuring 20 kanals 4 marlas
as described in the Plaint Schedule. This right of pre-
emption was claimed under Section 15(b) fourthly and fifthly
of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 as a co-sharer a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.