SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA PRASAD SINHA – Respondent


Advocates:

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 5

PETITIONER:

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS.

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

SURENDRA PRASAD SINHA

DATE OF JUDGMENT20/04/1992

BENCH:

RAMASWAMY, K.

BENCH:

RAMASWAMY, K.

JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J)

CITATION:

1992 AIR 1815 1992 SCR (2) 528

1993 SCC Supl. (1) 499 JT 1992 (3) 46

1992 SCALE (1)926

ACT:

Limitation Act, 1963-Section 3-Whether bars the right

to which a remedy related-Right to enforce debt by judicial

process-Scope of-Time barred debt-Realisation of-Filing of

suit to recover debt-Creditor’s obligation.

Penal Code, 1860-Section 405-Action in terms of a

contract-Whether amounts to criminal breach of trust or

misappropriation-Creditor in possession of security-

Adjustment of debt due from security-Justification of.

Penal Code, 1860-Section 409, 109/114-Complaint

petition-Maintainability-Duty of Magistrate, indicated-

Accused to be legally responsible for the offences charged-

Magistrate’s satisfaction of prima facie case-Criminal

justice-Objects of.

HEADNOTE:

On 5.5.1984, the Bank-Appellant No.1, gave a loan of

RS.15,000 to one S.N. Dubey. The resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top