PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA PRASAD SINHA – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 5
PETITIONER:
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
SURENDRA PRASAD SINHA
DATE OF JUDGMENT20/04/1992
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J)
CITATION:
1992 AIR 1815 1992 SCR (2) 528
1993 SCC Supl. (1) 499 JT 1992 (3) 46
1992 SCALE (1)926
ACT:
Limitation Act, 1963-Section 3-Whether bars the right
to which a remedy related-Right to enforce debt by judicial
process-Scope of-Time barred debt-Realisation of-Filing of
suit to recover debt-Creditor’s obligation.
Penal Code, 1860-Section 405-Action in terms of a
contract-Whether amounts to criminal breach of trust or
misappropriation-Creditor in possession of security-
Adjustment of debt due from security-Justification of.
Penal Code, 1860-Section 409, 109/114-Complaint
petition-Maintainability-Duty of Magistrate, indicated-
Accused to be legally responsible for the offences charged-
Magistrate’s satisfaction of prima facie case-Criminal
justice-Objects of.
HEADNOTE:
On 5.5.1984, the Bank-Appellant No.1, gave a loan of
RS.15,000 to one S.N. Dubey. The resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.