SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KAILASHBEN MATHURBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
GANDABHAI MATHURBHAI PATEL – Respondent
/ 0 29-04-2019



Advocates:
PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

SLP(C)……….D.No.8664/19

1

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.3 SECTION III

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ………………...Diary No(s).8664/2019

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-10-2017

in FA No.3168/2017 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at

Ahmedabad)

KAILASHBEN MATHURBHAI PATEL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

GANDABHAI MATHURBHAI PATEL & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.50446/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA

No.50447/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

and

IA

No.50448/2019-PERMISSION

TO

FILE

ADDITIONAL

DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

Date : 29-04-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

For Petitioner(s) Mr.Purvish Jitendra Malkan, AOR

Ms.Dharita Purvish Malkan, Adv.

Mr.Bhaskar Singh, Adv.

Mr.Alok Kumar, Adv.

Ms.Deepa G., Adv.

Ms.Khushboo Vinodsri Malkan, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr.Anshin H.Desai, Sr.Adv.

Mr.D.N.Ray, Adv.

Mr.Lokesh K.Choudhary, Adv.

Mr.Dillip Kumar Nayak, Adv.

Ms.Disha Ray, Adv.

Mrs.Sumita Ray, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

No proper explanation has been given by the learned

counsel for the petitioner to condone the delay of 426 days in

filing the special leave petition. The application for condonation

of delay is accordingly dismissed.

Digitally signed by

SATISH KUMAR YADAV

Date: 2019.04.29

17:34:13 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

SLP(C)……….D.No.8664/19

2

Even on merits, no ground for interference is made out in

exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution

of India.

The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed on

the ground of delay as also on merits.

As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory

applications also stand disposed of.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV)

(RAJ RANI NEGI)

AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top