SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MARKANDEY KATJU,GYAN SUDHA MISRA, , ,
AMAR NATH ROY – Appellant
Versus
ARUN KUMAR KEDIA – Respondent
CONMT.PET.(C) No.-000139-000139 / 2011 13-05-2011



Advocates:
SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CONTEMPT PETITION(C) NO.139/2011

IN

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2663 OF 2004

Amar Nath Roy & Others

..Petitioners

versus

Arun Kumar Kedia & Another

..Respondents

O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In this case, the tenant's appeal being Civil Appeal

No. 2663 of 2004 was dismissed by this Court by our order

dated November 04, 2009 and we gave the tenant nine months'

time from that date to vacate the premises in question.

Review Petition filed by the tenant was also dismissed on

March 25, 2010.

We are informed that the tenant has not vacated the

premises in question. Hence, this contempt petition.

Accordingly, we direct that the tenant-Anderson

Wright & Co. shall be evicted from 7, Red Cross Place, P.S.

Hare Street, Kolkata-700 001 forthwith by police force.

The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

............................J.

[MARKANDEY KATJU]

NEW DELHI;

............................J.

MAY 13, 2011

[GYAN SUDHA MISRA]

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top