SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PERRY KANSAGRA – Appellant
Versus
SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA – Respondent
C.A. No.-001694-001694 / 2019 27-09-2018



Advocates:
ARUNIMA DWIVEDI

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).9267/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-12-2017

in RP No.221/2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)

PERRY KANSAGRA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA Respondent(s)

(IA No.35874/2018-PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS)

Date : 27-09-2018 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

For Petitioner(s)

Mr.Inderjeet Saroop, Adv.

Ms.Anunya Mehta, Adv.

Mr.Raghav Saroop, Adv.

Ms.Arunima Dwivedi, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr.Saurabh Kirpal, Adv.

Mr.Prosenjeet Banerjee, Adv.

Ms.Mansi Sharma, Adv.

Ms.Shreya Singhal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Arguments concluded.

Judgment is reserved.

Learned counsel for the petitioner after conclusion

of the submission has presented a short note of arguments.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is

granted three days’ time to file the note of submission.

(Ashok Raj Singh) (Chander Bala)

Court Master

Court Master

List of Bare Acts

Family Courts Act, 1984

Digitally signed by

ANITA MALHOTRA

Date: 2018.09.27

17:34:18 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top