ASHOK BHAN,MARKANDEY KATJU
COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
M/S. GENERAL INSURANCE CORPN.OF INDIA – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 7
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 4422 of 2001
PETITIONER:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
RESPONDENT:
M/s General Insurance Corporation
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/09/2006
BENCH:
ASHOK BHAN & Markandey Katju
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
Bhan, J.
The question which arises for consideration in this
appeal is, as to whether the expenditure incurred in
connection with the issuance of bonus shares is a capital
expenditure or revenue expenditure. The question of law
framed in the High Court was:
(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case and in law the Tribunal was right in holding that
the expenditure incurred on account of share issue is
allowable expenditure?
The Assessee is an Insurance Company which has four
subsidiaries. For the assessment year 1991-92 the assessee
filed a return of income of Rs. 58,52,80,850/- along with the
audit report. The assessing Officer disallowed a few expenses
incurred as revenue expenditure, one of them being in the
sum of Rs. 1,04,28,500/- incurred towards the stamp duty
and registration fees paid in connection with the increase in
authorized share capi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.