SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ASHOK BHAN,MARKANDEY KATJU
COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
M/S. GENERAL INSURANCE CORPN.OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 7

CASE NO.:

Appeal (civil) 4422 of 2001

PETITIONER:

Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai

RESPONDENT:

M/s General Insurance Corporation

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/09/2006

BENCH:

ASHOK BHAN & Markandey Katju

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

Bhan, J.

The question which arises for consideration in this

appeal is, as to whether the expenditure incurred in

connection with the issuance of bonus shares is a capital

expenditure or revenue expenditure. The question of law

framed in the High Court was:

(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the

case and in law the Tribunal was right in holding that

the expenditure incurred on account of share issue is

allowable expenditure?

The Assessee is an Insurance Company which has four

subsidiaries. For the assessment year 1991-92 the assessee

filed a return of income of Rs. 58,52,80,850/- along with the

audit report. The assessing Officer disallowed a few expenses

incurred as revenue expenditure, one of them being in the

sum of Rs. 1,04,28,500/- incurred towards the stamp duty

and registration fees paid in connection with the increase in

authorized share capi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top