SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,DIPAK MISRA
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
KANDATH DISTILLERIES – Respondent


Advocates:
RAMESH BABU M. R.M. P. VINOD

Page 1

JUDGMENT

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1642 OF 2013

[Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 9098 of 2009]

State of Kerala and Others

.. Appellants

Versus

Kandath Distilleries

.. Respondent

J U D G M E N T

K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

1.

Leave granted.

2.

We are, in this appeal, concerned with the question whether

the High Court can issue a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India, directing the State to part with its

Page 2

JUDGMENT

2

exclusive privilege, in the matter of granting licence for

establishing distilleries under the Foreign Liquor (Compounding,

Blending and Bottling) Rules, 1975 (for short “1975 Rules”) read

with Section 14 of the Abkari Act (for short “the Act”).

3.

M/s Kandath Distilleries, respondent herein, claimed to have

submitted an application dated 12.1.1987 before the

Commissioner of Excise for a licence to establish a compounding,

blending and bottling unit in the Palakkad District. Few others

had also filed similar applications for licence for setting up

distillery units in the State of Kerala. All of them were directed to

first obta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top