Back
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
S.B. Sinha, CJ
Siddhi Digital Services – Appellant
Versus
ESPN Software India (P) Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims subscriber base and seeks signal supply. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on compliance and verification of subscriber data. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court emphasizes importance of validating claims made by signal seekers. (Para 15 , 30) |
| 4. regulatory compliance to be ensured before grant of signal supply. (Para 36 , 40 , 42) |
| 5. final directive for verification and documentation from the petitioner. (Para 50 , 52) |
JUDGMENT
1. These petitions involving common questions of law and fact were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
The basic fact of the matter would, however, be noticed from the case of ESPN i.e. i.e. Petition No.336(C) of 2012.
2. The Petitioner is a Multi Service Operator operating in the town of Sholapur in the State of Maharashtra.
The Respondents herein are broadcasters.
3. On or about 17.2.2012 the Petitioner made a request to the Respondent, asking it to supply the signals of their respective channels. The said request has not been responded to.
4. Inter alia, on the premise that the Petitioner came to learn upon attending a Seminar of this Tribunal held at Goa that there may be certain deficienci
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
