Back
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
S.B. Sinha, CJ, G. D. Gaiha, J, P.K. Rastogi, J
M/s Indian Cable Net Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
M/s Sudarshan Infocomm Welfare Society – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. subscription agreement execution and dispute initiation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's claim of outstanding payments. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. respondent's defenses against payment claims. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. compliance with regulatory notice requirements. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. liabilities related to subscription payments. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. jurisdiction of this tribunal over loan claims. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. return of assets and property claims. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. conclusion and order for payment. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
JUDGEMENT
P.K. Rastogi, Member
The petitioner is a Multi-System Operator(MSO). The respondent is a society of Cable operators.
2. The petittioner executed a subscription agreement on or about 01.08.2008 with the respondent for a period of three years. Under the said agreement, the respondent was to pay a sum of Rs. 8 lakhs per month inlcluding taxes. At the time of execution of the agreement, the petititoner paid an advance sum of Rs. 28.70 lakhs to the respondent for upgrading its cable network.
3. The petitioner has approached this Tribunal with regard to the letter of respond
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
