Back
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Shiva Kirti Singh, CJ, Mr. B.B. Srivastava, J, Mr. A.K. Bhargava, J
Tata Communications Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the telecom petitions (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. tcl's claims against mtnl (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. analysis of limitation issues (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. dispute resolution and claims validity (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. implications of mtnl's actions on contracts (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. consideration of mtnl's defense and arguments (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. legal standing under section 60 of the contract act (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. arguments on novation of contract (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 9. court's interpretation of contractual obligations (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 10. court's ruling on the legality of mtnl's deductions (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 11. final conclusions and orders granted by the tribunal (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORDER
By S.K. Singh, Chairperson –
Both the Telecom Petitions of 2012 have been preferred by M/s Tata Communications Ltd.(TCL) against Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and others. The third petition bearing T.P. : Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate No.64 of 2013 is by MTNL against TCL. In T.P. No.193 of 2012, TCL/petitioner has prayed for setting aside of circulars/letters dated 08.04.2009, 09.02.2010, 23.02.2010 and 08.04.2010, all issued b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
