TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, CJ
Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Tata Communications Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issue is the retrospective effect of 2018 regulations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. history of regulations and legal challenges influencing current case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. trai's actions leading to the 2018 regulations post the supreme court directive. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. petitioners seek retrospective application of 2018 regulations. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. petitioners argue that prior regulations remain effective despite quashing schedules. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. respondents contest claims based on prior compliance and validity of agreements. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. court reflects on legislative control over subordinate legislation authority. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. judicial interpretation principles regarding retrospective regulations not applicable. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. clarity in text of regulation prohibiting retrospective effect. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 10. final analysis: the court cannot grant retrospective effect of the regulations. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 11. court's reflection on jurisdiction limitations regarding legislation. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 12. examination of prior cases concerning validity of re |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.