SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(TDSAT) 2

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, CJ
Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Tata Communications Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Ms. Shriya Rayu Chaudhuri, Mr. Jayant Mehta, Ms. Swati Sinha, Ms. Taruna Prasad, Mr. Parth Awasthi, Mr. Parv Garg, Mr. Nalin Kohli, Mr. Tejveer Singh Bhatia, Ms. Vishakha Ahuja
For the Respondents: Mr. Meet Malhotra, Mr. Ashok K. Singh, Mr. Ravi S.S. Chauhan, Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Ms. Pallak Singh, Mr. Naresh K. Gaur, Mr. Dushyant Dave, Mr. Harsh Kaushik, Mr. Harsh Prakash, Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Saransh Gupta, Mr. Gopal Jain

Table of Content
1. common issue is the retrospective effect of 2018 regulations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. history of regulations and legal challenges influencing current case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. trai's actions leading to the 2018 regulations post the supreme court directive. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. petitioners seek retrospective application of 2018 regulations. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. petitioners argue that prior regulations remain effective despite quashing schedules. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. respondents contest claims based on prior compliance and validity of agreements. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. court reflects on legislative control over subordinate legislation authority. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
8. judicial interpretation principles regarding retrospective regulations not applicable. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
9. clarity in text of regulation prohibiting retrospective effect. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
10. final analysis: the court cannot grant retrospective effect of the regulations. (Para 42 , 43 , 44)
11. court's reflection on jurisdiction limitations regarding legislation. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)
12. examination of prior cases concerning validity of re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top