TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Aftab Alam, Chairperson, Mr. Kuldip Singh, Member
Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India & Others – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of defining gross revenue strictly in licensed activities. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the necessity for trai consultation in revenue definition. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. overview of conflicting positions regarding revenue streams. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. finality established regarding revenue obligations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion of the tribunal affirming earlier judgments. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
Members of petitioner Associations and other petitioners hold licenses for carrying on different activities in the telecom sector. As per condition of the license granted to them to carry on telecom services, the petitioners are required to pay a share out of the revenue generated by them for such service to the licensor. The relevant clause providing for revenue sharing is the same in all the licenses. Therefore, we have heard the petitions together. The petitioners are aggrieved of the interpretation being put by the licensor Department of Telecommunications (Government of India) on the question as to what constitutes gross revenue or what are the components of gross revenue available with a licensee from which the Government will take its share. Prior to 1999 when th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.