Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ING BANK NV & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
TUMPUAN MEGAH DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitration process overview. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of parties involved. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. dispute over contract existence. (Para 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. ruling from london tribunal. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. malaysian arbitration proceedings. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. registration of english judgment. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. respondent's objections to judgment. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 8. court of appeal's decision. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 9. judgment and appeal process. (Para 48 , 58 , 60 , 62) |
| 10. legal frameworks and enforcement. (Para 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 11. overview of reja and maa. (Para 67 , 68 , 69) |
| 12. reciprocity principle in enforcement. (Para 70 , 72 , 73) |
| 13. historical context of arbitration law. (Para 85 , 86 , 87) |
| 14. current applicability of legal statutes. (Para 134 , 135 , 136 , 137) |
| 15. enforcement pathways and principles. (Para 145 , 146 , 147) |
Introduction
[1] Arbitration allows parties to an international commercial partnership to resolve their disputes according to the agreement they undertook at the outset of their relationship. It envisages familiar rules for dispute resolution, a fair and trusted process and an impartial decision-maker. Essenti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
