HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ONG SOO KWEE – Appellant
Versus
ONG SOO KEOK & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. determination of estate distribution based on will. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. plaintiff failed to prove case; dismissed. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments on evidence, fraud, and estoppel. (Para 6 , 7) |
(Enclosure 1)
Introduction
[1] The parties in this suit are related to each other. Plaintiff (P) filed the present suit to determine whether the contents of the three (3) safe deposit boxes belonging to the late Loh Ah Moy @ Loh Siew Keng (LAM) should be distributed according to the last will of the deceased dated 4 March 1992.
[2] On 19 December 2024:
2.1 After considering all cause papers, evidence at the trial, and the parties' respective arguments on a balance of probabilities, I find that the plaintiff failed to discharge his burden to establish his case against the defendants. Accordingly, I dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
2.2 After hearing parties on costs, I have awarded global costs of RM60,000.00 to D1-D2, RM35,000.00 to D3-D7, RM5,000.00 to D8- D9, payable by P within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, subject to the allocator.
2.3 Aggrieved, P filed this appeal, and my reasons are as follows:
[3] The witnesses at the trial are:
(1) Plaintiff:
PW1:Mr
Syarikat Sebati Sdn Bhd v. Pengarah Jabatan Perhutanan & Anor
Latifah Mat Zin v. Rosmawati Sharibun & Anor
Guan Teik Sdn Bhd v. Hj Mohd Noor Hj Yakob & Ors
Johara Bi Abdul Kadir Marican v. Lawrence Lam Kwok Fou & Anor
Nanyang Development (1966) Sdn Bhd v. How Swee Poh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.