Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PUJIAN DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
THEAN JUN THYE & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff seeks fortuna injunction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. background facts of the case. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. plaintiff's arguments against debt claim. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. defendants' contentions on debt validity. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. legal principles governing fortuna injunction. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. court's analysis of debt and injunction. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 7. court's final decision and order. (Para 59) |
Introduction
[1] The Plaintiff in its Originating Summons sought a Fortuna Injunction to restrain the Defendants from presenting a winding up petition against it.
[2] This Court allowed the Plaintiff's application and the Defendants have filed an appeal against that decision.
The Pertinent Issues
[3] The principal issue for determination is whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought.
[4] Arising from the above dominant issue is the following subsidiary question, namely, whether there is an undisputed debt.
The Apposite Background Facts
[5] The origin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
