SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1990

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MOHD YUSOF BAJURI – Appellant
Versus
WARGA EDARAN SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Firdaus Mohamood ,Respondent Advocate: Lee Hong Yap

Table of Content
1. introductory facts regarding the parties and claims. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 10)
2. issue of partner liability for co-partners' actions. (Para 2 , 22 , 26)
3. final conclusion and order of the appeal. (Para 3)
4. court analysis of partnership liability under law. (Para 16 , 19 , 20)
5. criteria for establishing partnership liability. (Para 18 , 29 , 30)
6. pleading requirements for fraud allegations. (Para 37 , 39 , 41 , 44)
7. assessment of alleged admission of liability. (Para 48 , 49 , 52)
Ahmad Sharir Mohd Salleh J:

Introduction

[1] In this judgment, the parties are referred to as they were before the trial court. This appeal was filed by the 6th defendant against the decision of the Sessions court after a full trial. The Sessions court had found the 6th defendant jointly and severally liable with the other defendants in respect of the plaintiffs claim for the sum of RM115,750.00. This amount represented half of the sum which had been wrongfully transferred from the plaintiff's account to the 3rd defendant's account.

[2] The key issue in this appeal was whether a partner could be held liable for wrongful acts committed not by his co-partners but by other persons who were not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top