SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1294

HIGH COURT MALAYA SUNGAI PETANI
NOOR FAZILAH ISMAIL – Appellant
Versus
DR SITI ROKIAH ISHAK & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Shaline Nair Dibagaran ,Respondent Advocate: Nordiyanasari Omar

JUDGMENT

Narkunavathy Sundareson J:

Introduction

[1] For convenience, parties will be referred to as they were in the Sessions Court.

[2] This is the Plaintiffs appeal against the decision of the learned Session Court Judge (SCJ) dated 8 July 2024 wherein she dismissed the Plaintiffs application to enter judgment on admission of facts under O 27 r 3(1) Rules of Court 2012 ( ROC ).

[3] After careful consideration of the cause papers and submissions, this Court dismissed the Plaintiff's appeal on 9 February 2025. The following are the reasons for that decision.

Background Facts

[4] The Plaintiff instituted a suit in the Sessions Court claiming damages for alleged medical negligence whilst she underwent treatment in Kulim Hospital circa 2020.

[5] In their Statement of Defence, the Defendant denied the whole of the Plaintiff's claim and put her to strict proof.

Application Under Order 27 ROC

[6] The Plaintiff's application for judgment was premised on admissions made during case management of her suit on 30 May 2023 dan 20 December 2023 (Exhibits "NF-1" and "NF-2", pages 24 - 27 Rekod Rayuan Jilid II).

[7] The Plaintiff alleged that the Defendants were well aware of their negligence from thei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top