HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
TECHWARE ENTERPRISE SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CHAN SAI KHUEN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. developer failed to deliver (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claim for liquidated damages (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. preliminary matters discussed (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. developer's liability for damages (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 5. appeal dismissed (Para 60) |
JUDGMENT
(Appeal Against Summary Judgment)
Prelusion
[1] The Appellant-Defendant (D) was the developer of a housing development project known as "The Retreat" (Project). The Respondents-Plaintiffs (Ps) were the purchasers of a parcel of property in the Project.
[2] D and Ps entered into a prescribed Schedule H (Housing Development (Control And Licensing) Regulations 1989) sale and purchase agreement (SPA) to govern the purchase. D failed to deliver vacant possession (VP) of Ps' unit within the contracted period. This made D liable to pay Ps "liquidated damages" (LD), according to the relevant terms of the SPA.
[3] Ps filed this suit in the Sessions Court to claim the amount of LD they asserted they were entitled to. Ps applied to enter summary judgment against D (under O 14 of the Rules Of 2012). D resisted the entry of a summary judgment. The Sessions Court allowed Ps' application and ordered summ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.