Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
AMINAH AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review application (Para 1) |
| 2. pensioner suing for relief (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. high court's dismissal (Para 6) |
| 4. court of appeal's findings (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. federal court's ruling (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
JUDGMENT
The Application
[1] On 29 February 2024, I had granted the applicant leave to commence judicial review proceedings against the Government of Malaysia ("the Government") and the Director General of Public Services ("the Director General") for orders of mandamus which read as follows:
(a) to adjust the pension entitlement amounts in accordance with the formula contained in ss 3 and 6 of the Pension Adjustment Act 1980 ("PAA 1980") prior to its amendment under ss 3 and 7 of the Pensions Adjustment (Amendment) Act 2013 ("the 2013 Amendment Act"); and
(b) within 14 days or such time as this Honourable Court may determine, execute the payment of pension arrears ("the pension arrears") in favour of the applic
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
