Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
GEL – Appellant
Versus
PEL & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties' marriage and divorce proceedings (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. respondent's claims for document disclosure (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 3. court's ruling on relevance (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. dismissal of second discovery application (Para 53) |
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] This is the Respondent-Husband's second discovery application ("the Second Discovery Application") in encl 181 pursuant to O 24 of the Rules of 2012 ("Rules of "), for discovery of specific documents against the Petitioner-Wife.
[2] In the interest of privacy of the parties concerned and sensitivity of the issues, the Petitioner, Respondent and Co-Respondent have been anonymised respectively as GEL, PEL, and MEL.
The Factual Background
[3] The Petitioner, and Respondent (collectively, "the Parties"), both aged 58 and 59 respectively at the time of the hearing of the Second Discovery Application, were married in September 1989. Their union resulted in two adult children.
[4] Over time, the m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
