Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ADAM PRIMUS VARGHESE ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
KHEE SAN FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for judicial manager's remuneration (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments for conversion to writ action (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. requirement for witness testimony (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. cross-examination sufficiency (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. reasonableness of hourly rate (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 6. allegations of self-serving entries (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 7. counterclaim as basis for conversion (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 8. discovery necessity (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 9. pre-appointment and post-termination work (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71) |
| 10. sufficiency of documentation (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79) |
| 11. company's financial performance (Para 90 , 91 , 92 , 93) |
| 12. interaction with third parties (Para 98 , 99 , 100 , 101) |
| 13. taxation and remuneration assessment (Para 109 , 110 , 111 , 112) |
[1] Before the court is an application to convert an originating summons seeking remuneration of a former Interim Judicial Manager to a writ action. The former Interim Judicial Manager claims remuneration of approximately RM2.00 million for work done over a 10-month period while managin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
