Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
FSK MARKETING SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CONCRETE ENGINEERING PRODUCTS BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary judgment application details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background of goods sold. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. law on summary judgment standards. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. defendant's arguments against summary judgment. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 5. contractual documents in sales transactions. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. allegations of defects in goods. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. claims of oral agreements for payments. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 8. legitimacy of late payment interest. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 9. final judgment and order. (Para 57) |
Introduction
[1] This is a claim by the Plaintiff ("P") for goods sold and delivered to the Defendant ("D"). P filed an application dated 4 February 2025 in Enclosure 10 for summary judgment against D. Enclosure 10 is made under O 14 of the Rules of Court 2012.
[2] P seeks summary judgment against D for the principal amount of RM1,190,849.70 and accrued interest of RM264,078.45 as at 30 September 2024. Additionally, further interest at the rate of 1.5 % a month on the sum of RM1,190,849.70, cal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
