Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BANK PEMBANGUNAN MALAYSIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
SIDQI AHMAD SAID AHMAD & ORS (ENCLS 2 44 106 179 714 730) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of loan and defendants (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. plaintiff seeks discovery orders (Para 13 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. court analysis of temporal impossibility argument (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. principle of discovery in fraud cases (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. effect of letters of undertaking on discovery (Para 34 , 35 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. probative value of r&m's findings (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 7. legitimacy of payments received by defendants (Para 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 8. discovery to identify additional wrongdoers (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 9. propriety of the discovery application (Para 77 , 78 , 79) |
| 10. scope of documents sought in discovery (Para 85 , 86 , 88 , 89) |
| 11. relevance of defendants' connection to original loan (Para 104 , 105 , 106 , 108) |
| 12. conclusion and order for discovery (Para 113 , 114 , 115) |
[1] This is an application by the Plaintiff, Bank Pembangunan Malaysia Berhad, for discovery orders against Malayan Banking Berhad ("Maybank") and Maybank Islamic Berhad ("Maybank Islamic") to obtain banking records of the 4th Defendant, Roslina Binti Ibrahim ('Roslina"), the 24th Defendant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
