SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT MALAYA MELAKA
MAC PETROLEUM SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
EVERMORE ACCESS SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Chew Wee Kian,Melissa Ong Bee Ying ,Respondent Advocate: Yong Li Yang

Table of Content
1. disputes arising from the mou. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. importance of exclusive jurisdiction clauses. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. parties' arguments for or against jurisdiction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. court's evaluation of jurisdictional facts. (Para 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 21)
5. court's reasoning on applying malaysian law. (Para 24 , 28 , 29)
6. court's conclusion and decision. (Para 30)
Mohd Radzi Abdul Hamid J:

Matter Before This Court

[1] This is a decision on two (2) appeals each brought by the Plaintiff in appeals No MA-12ANCC-1-01/2024 and MA-12ANCC-2-01/2024 against the decision of the Sessions Court under civil suit no: MA-B52-NCC-32-08/2023. Appeal case 1-01 is against the decision of the Sessions Court under encl 6 to stay all proceedings pending adjudication of the Plaintiff's claim in a foreign forum. Appeal 2-01 is against the decision of the Sessions Court under encl 8 to not hear the Plaintiff's application for summary judgment against the Defendant following the Sessions Court decision to grant the stay.

Background Facts

[2] The core contention in both these appeals centers around the effect of a provision in an agreement called Memorandum of Understanding dat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top