SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 397

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEE LENG CHEN – Appellant
Versus
ADDEKOH SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ahmad Murad Abdul Aziz J:

Introduction

[1] Enclosure 1 is the Petition to wind-up the 1st Respondent ("the Company") based on the just and equitable principles provided by s 465(1)(b) of the Companies Act 2016 (" CA 2016").

[2] The Petitioner is a minority shareholder holding 38% shares, while Kong Siong Chen (R2) holds 62%. However, when the Company was first incorporated the shares were held 50-50 between the parties.

[3] The Company was set-up between the Petitioner and R2. When it was set-up the Petitioner's shares was held by his nominee one Madam Ong because the Petitioner was still employed in a different company.

[4] Although the Company was set-up like a partnership, nevertheless R2 held the majority shares.

[5] The grounds by the Petitioner to wind-up the Company are as follows:

(a) The whole substratum and objective of setting up the Company has vanished (loss of substratum).

(b) Loss of mutual trust and confidence between the 2 shareholders.

[6] On the issue of loss of substratum it is undisputed that the company's only business was the distribution of plastic additives produced by AVI Malaysia ("AVI") and throughout its existence the Company did not at any time attem


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top