SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1587

HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
LAGENDA MERSING SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF STAMP DUTY – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of the sale and purchase agreement and subsequent novation agreement. (Para 1 , 2)
2. plaintiff's argument on true market value and regulatory compliance. (Para 3)
3. collector's stance on valuation precedence and legal basis. (Para 4)
Abdul Wahab Mohamed JC:

[1] On 25 August 2020, LPB Development Sdn Bhd (LPB) entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement with Symphony Hills Sdn Bhd (Symphony) to acquire a property for RM29,855,022.12 (the said property).

[2] On 2 September 2022, LPB, Symphony, and the Plaintiff executed a Novation Agreement, under which the Plaintiff replaced LPB as the purchaser of the said property. On 24 October 2023, the Plaintiff signed the Memorandum of Transfer (Form 14A) and submitted a stamp duty adjudication application to the Collector of Stamp Duty (the Collector). To determine the applicable stamp duty, the Collector sought a valuation from the Valuation and Property Services Department (JPPH) which assessed the market value of the property at RM40,350,000.00. Unsatisfied with the valuation by JPPH, the Plaintiff filed Notice of Objection under s 38A(1) of the Stamp Act 1949 ( SA 1949), arguing that the stamp duty should be base

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top