Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
NAZLAN BAHARUDIN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MID QUANTUM SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of action by plaintiffs against the defendant. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's contention on ownership and payment. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's findings on burden of proof. (Para 5) |
| 4. background on the development and plaintiffs' purchases. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. core issue on legal and beneficial ownership. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. evidence supporting plaintiffs' claims. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. critique on liquidators' verification process. (Para 33) |
| 8. court’s evaluation of the sufficiency of documentation. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 9. recognition of not challenging authenticity of documents. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 10. combination of evidence leading to ownership. (Para 44 , 45) |
| 11. entitlement to strata documents. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 12. justification for injunction. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 13. final judgments and orders. (Para 61 , 62) |
Introduction
[1] This was an action commenced by seventeen plaintiffs against the defendant company, which is currently in liquidation. The plaintiffs sought for an order compelling
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
