Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
P KALIVANN PALANIVELU & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
FROGGER CREATION SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of plaintiffs and defendants (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. proper case for claim strike out (Para 3) |
| 3. fourth defendant's contentions and legal references (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. plaintiffs' counterarguments and legal principles (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. court's observations on striking out claims (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. final judgments and costs (Para 28) |
| 7. second and third defendants' contentions (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. court's decision regarding second and third defendants (Para 40 , 41) |
Introduction
[1] The Plaintiffs were introduced to the First Defendant company through the Fourth Defendant. Following that introduction, the Plaintiffs entered into an agreement with the First Defendant for renovation works to be carried out at their residence. Dissatisfied with the manner and outcome of the said works, the Plaintiffs commenced an action against the First Defendant, its directors, that is, the Second and Third Defendants and the Fourth Defendant.
[2] The present Notices of Application, found in encls 17 and 21, are brought by the Fourth Defendant and th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
