HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
CHINA RAILWAY ENGINEERING CORPORATION (M) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PERSPEKTIF MASA SDN BHD – Respondent
(Enclosure 13 - Application to Amend Winding-Up Petition)
Introduction
[1] The Petitioner applies vide encl 13 to amend the winding-up petition dated 27 December 2024 to substitute the originally named proposed liquidator, Mr Raveendra Kumar a/l Nathan, with Mr Sundarasan a/l Arumugam.
[2] The amendment is necessitated by a post-filing development-the appointment of Mr Raveendra Kumar as the Receiver and Manager (R & M) of the Respondent company by Sabah Development Bank Berhad on 25 February 2025, This disqualifies him from being appointed as the liquidator.
[3] The Petitioner also seeks an order to dispense with procedural requirements under r 32 of the Companies (Winding-Up) Rules 1972 — namely re-execution, re-service, advertisement, and Registrar attendance — on the basis that the Respondent has appeared and contested the petition, and no other creditor has intervened.
[4] The Respondent opposes the application, alleging procedural impropriety, bad faith, and ulterior motive.
Relevant Facts
[5] The winding-up petition was filed on 27 December 2024. The originally proposed liquidator, Mr Raveendra Kumar, later accepted an appointment as R&M of the Re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.