Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SARALEANE NATTAYA AZMI – Appellant
Versus
TECHNA-X BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment delivered after trial. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the share purchase agreement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. defendant's case and arguments. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's observations on payments and acknowledgments. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. legal consequences of signature acknowledgment. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 6. plaintiff's burden of proof. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 7. variations to the share purchase agreement. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 8. acknowledgment of full payment. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 9. defendant's alternative contentions rejected. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
Introduction
[1] This is a judgment delivered after a full trial.
[2] The Plaintiff's claim was for the sum of RM10,452,000.00 being the balance purchase consideration in respect of the sale of her 10,000,000 shares of one Mbits Digital Sdn Bhd to the Defendant. There were some variations to the terms of the agreement, particularly in relation to the payment terms What was initially a straightforward payment had morphed into payments by or through other third parties. Unfortunately, the parties were unable to provide any clarity to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
