Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEE RODGER MEIKLEJOHN – Appellant
Versus
RANJEET SINGH SIDHU & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the mareva injunction context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details on the plaintiff's investment and subsequent discoveries. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. filing of the mareva injunction and orders granted. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. arguments for the mareva injunction regarding the defendants. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. court's analysis on establishing a good arguable case. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. discussion on the risk of dissipation of assets. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. court's emphasis on the necessity of evidentiary standards. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. the need for specific evidence to establish dissipation risk. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. court ruling on the insufficiency of mere allegations for establishing risk. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 10. addressing the timeline and its impacts on dissipation risk. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 11. conclusion on the necessity of both arguable case and risk of dissipation. (Para 46 , 47) |
| 12. arguments regarding d6's involvement in the fraud. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 13. court's analysis of the risk of dissipation regarding d6. (Para 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 14. findings on historical |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
