• Point 1 [Paras 13-30], (!) - (!) : The court rejected late submissions of Ikatan Dokumen Tambahan and affidavits for not complying with prior directions, emphasizing procedural rules and fairness.
• Point 2 [Paras 22-29], (!) - (!) : Timely submission of documents is vital to fair trial; delays prejudice the defense and disrupt proceedings.
• Point 3 (!) - (!) , (!) : Lampiran 39 affidavit without proper jurat/translation fails to meet A 41 k 1(7)-(8) KKM 2012, leading to rejection.
• Point 4 (!) - (!) , (!) - (!) : The court exercised discretion to proceed without the late-added documents; applications rejected with costs to defendant.
• Point 5 (!) - (!) : Authority from Public Bank v National Feedlot on how undue delay and late documents undermine case management and trial integrity.

How to assess compliance with court directions in late document submissions?

What is the consequence of late document submissions on fairness and trial integrity?

What are the effects of refusing to admit late-originating affidavits and documents on the progress of the trial?