HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SETIAKON BUILDERS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MAYFAIR VENTURES SDN BHD – Respondent
[Plaintiff's Application To Amend Originating Summons]
Introduction
[1] By Enel. 31, the Plaintiff ("Setiakon") is applying under O 20 r 7, O 20 r 5, O 18 r 9 and/or O 92 r 4 of the Rules of Court, 2012 ("Rules") to amend the Originating Summons ("Amend OS Application").
[2] The Defendant ("Mayfair") is opposing that application.
[3] This Judgment is the Court's decision on that application.
Salient Facts
[4] In 2016 and 2017, Mayfair had appointed Setiakon as the Main Contractor for Phase 1 and Phase 2 of a development project in Persiaran Tropicana, in Mukim Damansara, District of Petaling, Selangor Darul Ehsan ("Project"). Phase 1 consisted of the construction of Blocks 1 and B1 of the Project, and Phase 2 consisted of the construction of Blocks A1 and B2 of the Project.
[5] In respect of Phase 1 of the Project:
(i) Setiakon had commenced works on 1 July 2016, and the Certificate of Practical Completion was issued on 31 January 2020;
(ii) The defects liability period had expired on 30 July 2022;
(iii) Setiakon alleges that, despite attending to all of the defects as notified to it by the architect, the architect and/or Mayfair have subsequently failed to issue the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.