HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
GLORYA KUPPA – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH PENDAFTARAN NEGARA & ORS – Respondent
Introduction
[1] The plaintiff is 27 years old. On 7 April 2025,1 dismissed her application for citizenship by operation of law brought in this originating summons. The main reliefs sought were framed as follows:
(a) A declaration that the plaintiff is a citizen pursuant to art 14(1)(b) read with s 1(a) of Part II of the Second Schedule and Section 19B of Part III of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitutionp.
(b) A declaration that the plaintiff is a citizen pursuant to art 14(1)(b) read with ss 1(e) and 2(3) of Part II of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution .
(c) In the alternative to (a) above, a declaration that the plaintiff is a citizen of pursuant to art 14(1)(b) read with s 1(a) of Part II of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution by virtue of the citizenship status of her adopted parents, Selvarani a/p Muthiah and Kuppa a/I Anthoney.
[2] The other reliefs sought are consequential, in the event one of the above reliefs are granted, namely, to issue a birth certificate stating that the plaintiff is a citizen of Malaysia and issuing her with a Malaysian identity card.
[3] For the sake of brevity, unless otherwise
Pendaftar Besar Kelahiran Dan Kematian Malaysia v. Pang Wee See & Anor
CTEB & Anor v. Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran Negara, Malaysia & Ors
CCH & Anor v. Pendaftar Besar Bagi Kelahiran & Kematian Malaysia
Lim Jen Hsian & Anor v. Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara & Ors
Than Siew Beng & Anor v. Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.