Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
M3 TECHNOLOGIES (ASIA) BERHAD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
VOON SZE LIN & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of damages under a cross-undertaking. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. outcome of the appeal and damages awarded to d2. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. key issues: causation and quantum of damages. (Para 7) |
| 4. arguments regarding absence of causation. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. legal foundations for undertaking in damages. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. court's discretion in assessing damages and causation factors. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. findings on improper issuance and plaintiffs' motives. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. causal link between the apo and damages suffered. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 9. claims for special damages and plaintiffs' objections. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 10. court's acceptance of recoverable special damages. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 11. contestation of general damages by d2 and plaintiffs. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 12. assessment of general damages and addressing distress. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 13. aggravated damages claim and plaintiffs' misconduct. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 14. court's rejection of the plaintiffs' rationale against aggravated damages. (Para 35 , 36) |
| 15. exemplary damages dispute and court's ruling. (Para 43 , 44) |
| 16. final order and awarding of damages. (Para 45) |
Introduction
[1] This judgment conce
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
