Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
KHOR YONG YONG – Appellant
Versus
TAN KHENG GUAN & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. winding up process and liquidator's appointment (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. liquidator's remuneration entitlement (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. liquidator's powers and duties (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. arguments against liquidator's remuneration (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. inclusion of solicitors' fees in expenses (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 6. order for payment of liquidator's fees and expenses (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
Prelusion
[1] The company: Shigen Polycolor Sdn Bhd (Company) was wound up. The Applicant: Mr Khor Yong Yong was appointed the Company's liquidator (Liquidator).
[2] The winding up Petition was presented by the 1st Respondent in this proceeding: Tan Kheng Guan (Tan). Tan made the 2nd Respondent in this proceeding: Chu Kok Khing (Chu), one of the respondents in the winding up Petition. The other respondent in the winding up Petition was the Company (a nominal respondent). The winding up Petition was part of the extended litigation (multiple legal proceedings) between Tan and Chu.
[3] The Liquidator set out to perform his work.
[4] Chu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
