Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
SULINDER KAUR PIKAN – Appellant
Versus
SYARIKAT RODA BULK MOVER SDN BHD & ANOR AND ANOTHER CASE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to applications and dismissal (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts of the case (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. issues for determination (Para 7) |
| 4. procedural objections and jurisdiction (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. disclosure and justification for ex parte relief (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. urgency and justification for appointment (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. burden of proof on respondents (Para 19 , 20) |
| 8. discretionary nature of interim liquidator appointment (Para 21 , 22) |
Introduction
[1] These grounds concern two applications—encl 22 in Case 237 and encl 21 in Case 238—filed by the respective Respondents to set aside the Ex Parte Order dated 21 May 2024 by which this Court appointed an Interim Liquidator over the First Respondent pursuant to the Petitioner's application.
[2] Having heard both applications together, considered the affidavits filed by both sides, the written and oral submissions of counsel, and the applicable legal principles, I dismissed both applications. My reasons are set out below.
Background Facts
[3] The First Respondent, Syarikat Roda Bulk Mover Sdn Bhd, is a family-owned company jointly owned and directed by the Petitioner and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
