SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1451

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
VIMALA MARUTHAMUTHOO – Appellant
Versus
PAUL MONASH NARAYANASAMY (ENCLS 1 & 6) – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Etrus Tan ,Respondent Advocate: J J Naidu

JUDGMENT

Jamhirah Ali J:

Introduction

[1] Enclosure 1 is the Plaintiff's application made pursuant to ss 327, 329, and 417 of the National Land Code 1965 (NLC 1965) seeking an order to remove the private caveat lodged by the Defendant, Paul Monash a/l Narayanasamy, on 3 April 2024 over the property held under Geran 339999, Lot 126483, Mukim Dengkil, Daerah Sepang, Negeri Selangor (the Property).

[2] The Plaintiff's application was premised on the assertion that the Defendant has no caveatable interest in the Property, and that the continued presence of the caveat causes serious prejudice to the Plaintiff, who has fully performed her obligations under a valid sale and purchase transaction.

[3] Prior to the decision of this application, the Court had, via encl 6, dismissed the application by one Kavitah a/p Vathumalai to intervene in this proceeding in respect of the private caveat lodged by her on 10 July 2023.

Facts Of The Case

[4] The Property in question is held under Geran 339999, Lot 126483, Mukim Dengkil, Daerah Sepang, Negeri Selangor. On 11 April 2023, the Plaintiff, Vimala a/p Maruthamuthoo, entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) with the registered owners of the Prope

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top