Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MALTOOL INDUSTRIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
THRIVE GLORY SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appellant's claim and vehicle defects. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. appellant's arguments regarding evidence and expert testimony. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. respondents' defense and burden of proof. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. key issues in the appeal. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. burden of proof and necessity for expert evidence. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. appellant's rejection of the vehicle and its justification. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. discussion on remedies and warranty obligations. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. distinguishing defects from inherent characteristics. (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. understanding merchantable quality. (Para 47 , 48) |
| 10. application of the consumer protection act 1999. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 11. final conclusion and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the Sessions Court dated 17 August 2022, which, after a full trial, dismissed its claim against the Respondents. The claim concerned a brand new Mazda vehicle which the Appellant alleged was defective
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
