SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 894

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
HOO SOOT KHING – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Faizal Rosli,Nur Hannan Mohd Khafidz ,Respondent Advocate: Chan Jia Ying

JUDGMENT

Yusrin Faidz Yusoff JC:

Introduction

[1] This judgment concerns a foreclosure action brought by Maybank Islamic Berhad ("plaintiff") against Hoo Soot Khing ("defendant") over the default in repaying two financing facilities secured by charges over the defendant's property. The plaintiff seeks an order for sale of the property under Section 256 of the National Land Code 1965 . The Court has carefully considered the submissions and evidence presented by both parties and now delivers its judgment.

Background Facts

[2] The defendant together with David Chua Kok Tee and Chua Hung Tatt ('the Borrowers') obtained two financing facilities from the plaintiff bank. The first facility was a housing loan of RM285,000.00, including legal fees of RM25,000.00 and a valuation fee of RM10,000.00, for the purpose of refinancing a double storey Bungalow located at Mukim Kuala Lumpur, Daerah Kuala Lumpur, Negeri Wilayah Persekutuan KL, which is held under Hakmilik Sementara H.S. (D) 31844, PT 621 bearing postal address of No 33, Lorong Bruas, Damansara Heights, 50490 Kuala Lumpur ("the Property"). The second facility was a term loan of RM1,000,000.00.

[3] The Borrowers entered into two separate C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top