HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MUHAMMED YUSOFF RAWTHER – Appellant
Versus
DATO SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM; KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN SIASATAN JENAYAH POLIS D.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discovery application and procedural background (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiff's arguments for discovery (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. defendant's opposition to plaintiff's claims (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court analysis on requirements of discovery (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. relevance and necessity in discovery application (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. judicial estoppel related to plaintiff's claims (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. applicability of polygraph results in civil proceedings (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. potential implications of relying on polygraph tests (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. discussion on privileged documents (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 10. court view on public interest and privilege (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 11. plaintiff's inconsistent positions on privilege (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 12. outcome of the discovery application (Para 52) |
| 13. court's final dismissal of application (Para 53 , 54) |
(For An Application Under Order 24 Rule 7A Of The Rules Of Court 2012)
Introduction
[1] The Plaintiff in the main action had filed a discovery application under O 24 r 7A of the Rules of Court 2012 (' ROC 2012") ("
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.