HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
KOK PEEK BOON – Appellant
Versus
AIA BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. undisputed material facts of the case (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's argument against affidavit validity (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. plaintiff's defense of affidavit's integrity (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's discretion to allow procedural rectifications (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. importance of substantive justice over procedural technicalities (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
[1] Like a scene lifted from Steven Spielberg's Minority Report, where fate is sealed by precogs' premonitory glimpses of a future not yet lived, this case turns on an affidavit that appears to defy time itself. The plaintiff now seeks leave under O 41 r 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 ("the Rules") to regularise this temporal anomaly by reaffirming the affidavit. The impugned paragraph refers to an event that took place three days after the affidavit was affirmed, as if the deponent had peered into the future. The defendant objects strenuously, insisting the defect is no mere slip but a fatal flaw that strikes at the heart of admissibility. After careful scrutiny of the submissions and authorities, this Court grants the plaintiff's application, for the reasons that follow.
Background
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.