Back
Next 
2019 MarsdenLR 955
MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. RUDIANA RAZALI
[Rayuan Jenayah No: BA-42LB-04-01/2018]
Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Raimi Mohd Ramli ,Respondent Advocate: Izleen Ismail
The appeal was dismissed as the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case under section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001.
Headnote:This case involves an appeal by the prosecution against the acquittal of the respondent under section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001. The trial court determined the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case before calling the respondent to defend. The court held the charge faulty, as negligence is not included in the specified offense under the cited law. The court reiterated the burden of proof lies with the prosecution to present a case beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed and the trial court's decision upheld.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment on prosecutorial appeal's merits. (Para 1 , 2) |
[1] Ini adalah rayuan Pendakwa Raya (perayu) terhadap keputusan Hakim Mahkamah Sesyen Ampang (hakim bicara yang bijaksana) yang telah melepaskan dan membebaskan responden di akhir kes pendakwaan, tanpa dipanggil membela diri, bagi pertuduhan di bawah s 31(1)(a) Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001 [Akta 611].
[2] Pihak perayu telah terkilan dengan keputusan hakim bicara yang telah melepaskan dan membebaskan responden di akhir kes pendakwaan, tanpa dipanggil membela diri bagi pertuduhan tersebut.
