SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 2185

MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. RUDIANA RAZALI
[Rayuan Jenayah No: BA-42LB-04-01/2018]



Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Raimi Mohd Ramli ,Respondent Advocate: Izleen Ismail

The appeal was dismissed as the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case under section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001.

Headnote:This case involves an appeal by the prosecution against the acquittal of the respondent under section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001. The trial court determined the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case before calling the respondent to defend. The court held the charge faulty, as negligence is not included in the specified offense under the cited law. The court reiterated the burden of proof lies with the prosecution to present a case beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed and the trial court's decision upheld.

Table of Content
1. judgment on prosecutorial appeal's merits. (Para 1 , 2)

[1] Ini adalah rayuan Pendakwa Raya (perayu) terhadap keputusan Hakim Mahkamah Sesyen Ampang (hakim bicara yang bijaksana) yang telah melepaskan dan membebaskan responden di akhir kes pendakwaan, tanpa dipanggil membela diri, bagi pertuduhan di bawah s 31(1)(a) Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001 [Akta 611].

[2] Pihak perayu telah terkilan dengan keputusan hakim bicara yang telah melepaskan dan membebaskan responden di akhir kes pendakwaan, tanpa dipanggil membela diri bagi pertuduhan tersebut.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top